The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd, Rep. by its ExecutiveDirector G. L. Bhagwat, Bangur Nagar, DANDELI. vs Ms Subramaniyam and Co. by its P.A Holder and Anthorised signatory Mr.S.G. Kaarthik Aged Major — 117/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 194. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK410005492016
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
117/2016
Filing Date
11-08-2016
Registration No
117/2016
Registration Date
11-08-2016
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The West Coast Paper Mills Ltd, Rep. by its ExecutiveDirector G. L. Bhagwat, Bangur Nagar, DANDELI.
Adv. SOMAKUMAR S
Respondent(s)
Ms Subramaniyam and Co. by its P.A Holder and Anthorised signatory Mr.S.G. Kaarthik Aged Major
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 27-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 09-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 17-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-12-2025 | OBJECTIONS |
Interim Orders
The court order dated 20-08-2022 in Case No. 117-2016 details specific sections of the Indian Penal Code and related provisions that have been applied or considered in this matter. The order references multiple sections including IPC sections 10-88, 89-95, 96-102, 103, 104-106, and sections 2 and 2(A) of another statute, indicating the legal framework governing the case. The document appears to be a substantive legal order addressing various criminal law provisions, though the precise outcome (conviction, acquittal, or bail decision) is not explicitly stated in the extracted portions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order dated 20-08-2022 in Case No. 117-2016 details specific sections of the Indian Penal Code and related provisions that have been applied or considered in this matter. The order references multiple sections including IPC sections 10-88, 89-95, 96-102, 103, 104-106, and sections 2 and 2(A) of another statute, indicating the legal framework governing the case. The document appears to be a substantive legal order addressing various criminal law provisions, though the precise outcome (conviction, acquittal, or bail decision) is not explicitly stated in the extracted portions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts