State of Karnataka Rep by PSI Dandeli Town P.S. vs Davalsab Neeralagi Age-35 years, r/o Subhash Nagar, Dandeli — 96/2016

Case under 5,37,38,39,Karanataka Money Lenders Act 1961 and U.sec 3, 4, Karanata Pro Pf Char Expr Intst Act 04 Section 73. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK410004412016

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

28th March 2026

Filing Number

96/2016

Filing Date

08-07-2016

Registration No

96/2016

Registration Date

08-07-2016

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI

Judge

524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI

Acts & Sections

5,37,38,39,Karanataka Money Lenders Act 1961 and U.sec 3, 4, Karanata Pro Pf Char Expr Intst Act 04 Section 73

Petitioner(s)

State of Karnataka Rep by PSI Dandeli Town P.S.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Davalsab Neeralagi Age-35 years, r/o Subhash Nagar, Dandeli

Hearing History

Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

19-01-2026

NBW

10-12-2025

NBW

17-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

27-10-2022
Deposition

The document appears to be a Kannada court order from the High Court of Karnataka (case no. S.N. 96-2016, dated 27-10-2022). While the text quality is poor and somewhat garbled in places, the document discusses a criminal matter involving evidence, witness statements, and detailed procedural directions. The order contains extensive instructions regarding examination of witnesses, collection of materials (including letters and currency notes), and scheduling of court proceedings on specific dates. However, due to the significant readability issues in the document, I cannot provide a definitive summary of the final judgment or outcome. SKIP - The document text is too garbled and illegible to reliably determine and summarize the specific court order outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The document appears to be a Kannada court order from the High Court of Karnataka (case no. S.N. 96-2016, dated 27-10-2022). While the text quality is poor and somewhat garbled in places, the document discusses a criminal matter involving evidence, witness statements, and detailed procedural directions. The order contains extensive instructions regarding examination of witnesses, collection of materials (including letters and currency notes), and scheduling of court proceedings on specific dates. However, due to the significant readability issues in the document, I cannot provide a definitive summary of the final judgment or outcome. SKIP - The document text is too garbled and illegible to reliably determine and summarize the specific court order outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case