Smt. Anjumbano D/o Hussainsab Murtaza, Age. 36 Yrs, R/o. Bastwad, Belagavi. vs Register of the Births and Deaths and Commissioner CMC, Dandeli. — 155/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3),10(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK410003722026
Filing Number
155/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Anjumbano D/o Hussainsab Murtaza, Age. 36 Yrs, R/o. Bastwad, Belagavi.
Adv. MUSHTAQ AHAMED ABDULLA SHAIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.Register of the Births and Deaths and Commissioner CMC, Dandeli.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Misc 155/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, to register her birth. The petitioner proved through evidence (non-availability certificates, school transfer certificate, and Aadhar card) that she was born on 08-11-1989 in Dandeli but her birth was never registered. The respondent (Register of Births and Deaths) did not contest the petition. The court directed the respondent to issue a birth certificate after collecting the applicable late fee from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
21-Apr-2026
Deposition
-
21-Apr-2026
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2026
Case Summary: Criminal Misc 155/2026 The court allowed the petitioner's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Birth and Deaths Act, 1969, to register her birth. The petitioner proved through evidence (non-availability certificates, school transfer certificate, and Aadhar card) that she was born on 08-11-1989 in Dandeli but her birth was never registered. The respondent (Register of Births and Deaths) did not contest the petition. The court directed the respondent to issue a birth certificate after collecting the applicable late fee from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts