Sri. Dhananjay Rajiv Gadagil 44yrs Occ.Agriculture R/oH.No.37 Thakurwada Village Vaini Jagalbet UK vs Sri.Ibrahim P Mohammdali Kutti 31yrs Occ.Coolie R/o Reddy camp Illva Ambeli Tq.Joida UK — 70/2017
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 62. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK410002922017
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
70/2017
Filing Date
02-03-2017
Registration No
70/2017
Registration Date
02-03-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Dhananjay Rajiv Gadagil 44yrs Occ.Agriculture R/oH.No.37 Thakurwada Village Vaini Jagalbet UK
Adv. Sri.R.D.Jadhav
Respondent(s)
Sri.Ibrahim P Mohammdali Kutti 31yrs Occ.Coolie R/o Reddy camp Illva Ambeli Tq.Joida UK
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court found that the petitioner paid insufficient stamp duty on an agreement dated 17.12.2012 involving consideration of Rs. 90,000. Required stamp duty at 5% was Rs. 4,500, but only Rs. 100 was paid, creating a deficit of Rs. 4,400. The court ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 48,500 (ten times the deficit plus the original duty amount) as penalty under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Case adjourned to 20.04.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court found that the petitioner paid insufficient stamp duty on an agreement dated 17.12.2012 involving consideration of Rs. 90,000. Required stamp duty at 5% was Rs. 4,500, but only Rs. 100 was paid, creating a deficit of Rs. 4,400. The court ordered the petitioner to pay Rs. 48,500 (ten times the deficit plus the original duty amount) as penalty under the Karnataka Stamp Act. Case adjourned to 20.04.2022. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts