Smt. Saidabanu w/o Hassan Khan,Occupation Housewife. vs Sri Hasan s/o Late. Sattar Khan,Occupation Selling Cloth Business. — 3/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 128. Status: For balance payment. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK410000382025
Filing Number
3/2025
Filing Date
09-Jan-2025
Registration No
3/2025
Registration Date
09-Jan-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Saidabanu w/o Hassan Khan,Occupation Housewife.
Adv. Afreen Riyaz Kittur
-
2.Kumari Aaira d/o Hasan Khan,Minor.U/g her mother Petitioner No 1.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri Hasan s/o Late. Sattar Khan,Occupation Selling Cloth Business.
Case History
-
04-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
For balance payment
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
08-Apr-2026
For balance payment
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
25-Mar-2026
Mediation
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
13-Mar-2026
Mediation
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
07-Mar-2026
Mediation
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
11-Feb-2026
Mediation
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
31-Jan-2026
Mediation
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
17-Jan-2026
Mediation
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
06-Dec-2025
For steps
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
29-Nov-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.03/2025 Saidabanu and her minor daughter Aaira filed a petition under Section 128 of CrPC seeking recovery of Rs.72,000 in unpaid maintenance arrears from respondent Hassan Khan for the period June 12, 2023 to December 12, 2024. A prior maintenance order dated February 8, 2023 (under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005) had directed the respondent to pay Rs.3,000 monthly to Saidabanu and Rs.1,000 monthly to Aaira, but he defaulted on these payments. The respondent objected on grounds of limitation, arguing the petition was filed beyond the 12-month period stipulated under Section 125(3) CrPC. The court overruled this objection, holding the petition maintainable. The judge relied on Supreme Court precedents establishing that maintenance is a continuing obligation and the one-year limitation applies only to enforcement mechanisms (custody detention), not to the right to claim arrears. The petition is declared maintainable and proceeds to substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Nov-2025
For steps
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
03-Nov-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
30-Oct-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
10-Oct-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
03-Oct-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
06-Sep-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
19-Jul-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
17-Jun-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
29-Apr-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
15-Feb-2025
Objections
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
28-Jan-2025
Objections
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
09-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2025
Case Summary: Crl.Misc.No.03/2025 Saidabanu and her minor daughter Aaira filed a petition under Section 128 of CrPC seeking recovery of Rs.72,000 in unpaid maintenance arrears from respondent Hassan Khan for the period June 12, 2023 to December 12, 2024. A prior maintenance order dated February 8, 2023 (under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005) had directed the respondent to pay Rs.3,000 monthly to Saidabanu and Rs.1,000 monthly to Aaira, but he defaulted on these payments. The respondent objected on grounds of limitation, arguing the petition was filed beyond the 12-month period stipulated under Section 125(3) CrPC. The court overruled this objection, holding the petition maintainable. The judge relied on Supreme Court precedents establishing that maintenance is a continuing obligation and the one-year limitation applies only to enforcement mechanisms (custody detention), not to the right to claim arrears. The petition is declared maintainable and proceeds to substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts