Navodaya Multi Purpose Souhardha Sahakar Niyamitha vs Umesh Shesha Kharvi — 1779/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Reissue NBW to Accused. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK320019672025

Reissue NBW to Accused

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

1779/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2024

Registration No

1779/2025

Registration Date

12-08-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL

Judge

1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Navodaya Multi Purpose Souhardha Sahakar Niyamitha

Adv. Nagaraj Sukrappa Naik

Respondent(s)

Umesh Shesha Kharvi

Hearing History

Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

02-06-2026

Reissue NBW to Accused

27-04-2026

Reissue NBW to Accused

21-04-2026

Reissue NBW to Accused

18-04-2026

EVIDENCE

01-04-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

07-02-2026
Deposition

Case 1779/2025 Summary In this civil case between Navodaya Multi Purpose Souhardha Sahakar Niyamitha (petitioner) and Umesh Shesha Kharvi (respondent), the court hearing dated 07-02-2026 proceeded with examination of the petitioner organization's manager as a witness. Multiple documentary evidence was presented and marked as exhibits, including checks, bank memoranda, notices, postal receipts, loan applications, loan agreements, guarantee documents, promissory notes, debit slips, and loan account details (marked as NIP-1 through NIP-12). The respondent's counsel requested time for cross-examination, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 1779/2025 Summary In this civil case between Navodaya Multi Purpose Souhardha Sahakar Niyamitha (petitioner) and Umesh Shesha Kharvi (respondent), the court hearing dated 07-02-2026 proceeded with examination of the petitioner organization's manager as a witness. Multiple documentary evidence was presented and marked as exhibits, including checks, bank memoranda, notices, postal receipts, loan applications, loan agreements, guarantee documents, promissory notes, debit slips, and loan account details (marked as NIP-1 through NIP-12). The respondent's counsel requested time for cross-examination, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case