Bachcha Pursu Marati vs Souban Salman Adam Saheb — 313/2021
Case under Legal Practitioners Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUK320009002021
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
41/2021
Filing Date
13-10-2021
Registration No
313/2021
Registration Date
22-10-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL
Judge
1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bachcha Pursu Marati
Adv. G.M.Moger
Respondent(s)
Souban Salman Adam Saheb
The Branch Manager Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 313/2021 Bachcha Pursu Marati v. Souban Salman Adam Saheb & Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. On 08-11-2024, the court heard the petitioner's case where witnesses were examined and sworn in. The petitioner's advocate submitted various documents including FIR, charge sheet, court orders in CC No. 429/2020, injury certificates, discharge summary, medical expense receipts (marked as Exh. 10-15), and medicine receipts (marked as Exh. 16). The case was adjourned for continued hearing as the petitioner's counsel requested further time for cross-examination and arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 313/2021 Bachcha Pursu Marati v. Souban Salman Adam Saheb & Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. On 08-11-2024, the court heard the petitioner's case where witnesses were examined and sworn in. The petitioner's advocate submitted various documents including FIR, charge sheet, court orders in CC No. 429/2020, injury certificates, discharge summary, medical expense receipts (marked as Exh. 10-15), and medicine receipts (marked as Exh. 16). The case was adjourned for continued hearing as the petitioner's counsel requested further time for cross-examination and arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts