Ishrat Fathima W/o. Tanveer Khan vs Annis Khan S/o. Abdul Hameed Khan — 307/2024

Case under Legal Practitioners Act Section U/s.164,R/w.232,KMVRules. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUK320005672024

JUDGMENTS

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

56/2024

Filing Date

03-08-2024

Registration No

307/2024

Registration Date

21-08-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL

Judge

1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

Acts & Sections

Legal Practitioners Act Section U/s.164,R/w.232,KMVRules

Petitioner(s)

Ishrat Fathima W/o. Tanveer Khan

Adv. G M Moger

Aakifa S/o. Tanveer Khan, Minor, Next friend Mother Ishrat Fathima W/o. Tanveer Khan

Mohammed Sarmad S/o. Tamveer Khan, Minor, Next friend Mother Ishrat Fathima W/o. Tanveer Khan

Respondent(s)

Annis Khan S/o. Abdul Hameed Khan

Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

13-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

17-11-2025
Issue
06-02-2026
Deposition

Summary In Motor Vehicle Case (MVC) 307/2024 dated 06-02-2026, the court dismissed the petitioner's claim for compensation arising from a fatal motorcycle accident. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient evidence regarding the second defendant's negligence and could not substantiate the claimed damages for funeral expenses and vehicle rental costs. The petition was rejected, and the case was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Motor Vehicle Case (MVC) 307/2024 dated 06-02-2026, the court dismissed the petitioner's claim for compensation arising from a fatal motorcycle accident. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish sufficient evidence regarding the second defendant's negligence and could not substantiate the claimed damages for funeral expenses and vehicle rental costs. The petition was rejected, and the case was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case