Joseph Martin Dsouza vs Epipaniya Disouza — 42/2019
Case under Under Order 41 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc 1908. Status: AWAIT ORDER. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAUK320003282019
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
40/2019
Filing Date
22-11-2019
Registration No
42/2019
Registration Date
22-11-2019
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL
Judge
1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Joseph Martin Dsouza
Adv. K. R. Naik
Respondent(s)
Epipaniya Disouza
Latish W/o Suresh Naik
Smt. Juliyana Kom Duming Dsouza
James Dsouza
Bernad Dsouza
Tony Dsouza
Anita Dsouza
Marry Dsouza
Veena Dsouza
Noyal
Glan Dias
Teresa Dsouza
Isaparance Dsouza
Mark S/o Pelis Dsouza
Eliza S/o Bastav Dsouza
Francis S/o Bastav Dsouza
Shankar Narayan Bhatrabhitlu
Hearing History
Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL
AWAIT ORDER
AWAIT ORDER
AWAIT ORDER
AWAIT ORDER
AWAIT ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 13-03-2026 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 13-02-2026 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 09-01-2026 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 21-11-2025 | AWAIT ORDER |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 42/2019 Outcome: The Interlocutory Application (IA No. III) filed by appellant Joseph Martin D'Soza seeking permission to produce additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC has been DISMISSED by the Senior Civil Judge, Bhatkal on 29 October 2024. Key Finding: The court found that the appellant failed to establish sufficient grounds for admitting additional evidence. The appellant admitted obtaining documents from the Land Tribunal only after the trial court's dismissal, but could not prove these documents were unknown to him despite exercising due diligence during the original trial. Since the documents were publicly available and the appellant provided no valid reason for their earlier non-production, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 42/2019 Outcome: The Interlocutory Application (IA No. III) filed by appellant Joseph Martin D'Soza seeking permission to produce additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of CPC has been DISMISSED by the Senior Civil Judge, Bhatkal on 29 October 2024. Key Finding: The court found that the appellant failed to establish sufficient grounds for admitting additional evidence. The appellant admitted obtaining documents from the Land Tribunal only after the trial court's dismissal, but could not prove these documents were unknown to him despite exercising due diligence during the original trial. Since the documents were publicly available and the appellant provided no valid reason for their earlier non-production, the application was rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts