Guru Nagesh Devadiga vs Purushottam Umesh Naik — 1/2024

Case under Workmen's Compensation Act Section U/Sec.3,4. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

ECA - EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION APPLICA

CNR: KAUK320002542024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

1/2024

Filing Date

25-04-2024

Registration No

1/2024

Registration Date

25-04-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL

Judge

1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

Acts & Sections

Workmen's Compensation Act Section U/Sec.3,4

Petitioner(s)

Guru Nagesh Devadiga

Adv. K. Pradeep Kumar Shetty

Respondent(s)

Purushottam Umesh Naik

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Honnavar Branch

Hearing History

Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

17-04-2026

EVIDENCE

27-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

06-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 1/2024 On 06-02-2026, the court heard oral arguments in this case. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence including FIR copies, medical reports, injury certificates, discharge summaries, photographs, CDs, medicine receipts, and supporting documents, which were marked as exhibits. The second respondent's counsel objected to certain documents but the court admitted them as evidence. The second respondent's counsel sought time to file a counter-affidavit, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1/2024 On 06-02-2026, the court heard oral arguments in this case. The petitioner's counsel presented evidence including FIR copies, medical reports, injury certificates, discharge summaries, photographs, CDs, medicine receipts, and supporting documents, which were marked as exhibits. The second respondent's counsel objected to certain documents but the court admitted them as evidence. The second respondent's counsel sought time to file a counter-affidavit, and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case