Manju Bin Sannu Gond vs Shivaram Nagappa Gond — 10/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ,7Rule1.2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAUK320002152024

Filing Number

10/2024

Filing Date

20-Mar-2024

Registration No

10/2024

Registration Date

20-Mar-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL

Judge

1229-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section ,7Rule1.2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manju Bin Sannu Gond

    Adv. R.R.Shreshty

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shivaram Nagappa Gond

  2. 2.Narayana Nagappa Gonda

  3. 3.Ravi Nagappa Gonda

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  8. 16-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  9. 25-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  10. 10-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  11. 18-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  12. 20-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  14. 06-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  15. 28-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  16. 12-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  17. 05-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  18. 15-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  19. 02-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  20. 20-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  21. 12-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  22. 02-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Case Summary: 10/2024 Outcome: The Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. II) for temporary injunction filed by Manju Bin Sannu Gond has been DISMISSED. The Senior Civil Judge found that the appellant failed to establish the three essential elements required for granting temporary injunction: prima facie case, balance of convenience in his favor, and irreparable loss if the injunction is refused. The court noted the appellant had not proven possession of the disputed property (bearing Sy.No. 59/2) and lacked definite evidence that respondents were constructing on the suit schedule property rather than on their own adjacent land (Sy.No. 58/3), which is approximately 50 meters away. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 17-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  25. 07-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  26. 01-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  27. 27-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  29. 19-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  30. 11-Mar-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  31. 07-Mar-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  32. 07-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  33. 10-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  34. 09-Jan-2025

    For steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  35. 19-Dec-2024

    For steps

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  36. 12-Dec-2024

    Court Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  37. 27-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  38. 13-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  39. 29-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  40. 15-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  41. 23-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  42. 03-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  43. 14-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  44. 01-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  45. 18-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  46. 10-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  47. 22-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  48. 04-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  49. 18-Apr-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Bhatkal

  50. 20-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 20-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 10/2024 Outcome: The Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. II) for temporary injunction filed by Manju Bin Sannu Gond has been DISMISSED. The Senior Civil Judge found that the appellant failed to establish the three essential elements required for granting temporary injunction: prima facie case, balance of convenience in his favor, and irreparable loss if the injunction is refused. The court noted the appellant had not proven possession of the disputed property (bearing Sy.No. 59/2) and lacked definite evidence that respondents were constructing on the suit schedule property rather than on their own adjacent land (Sy.No. 58/3), which is approximately 50 meters away. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case