Narayan Timmappa Naik vs Laxmi Kom Madev Naik Advocate - J. D. Bhat — 6/2020
Case under Under Order 41 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc 1908. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAUK320000572020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
6/2020
Filing Date
23-03-2020
Registration No
6/2020
Registration Date
23-03-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL
Judge
1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narayan Timmappa Naik
Adv. R. R. Shresty
Respondent(s)
Laxmi Kom Madev Naik Advocate - J. D. Bhat
Hearing History
Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 21-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 10-02-2026 | ORDERS |
| 31-01-2026 | ORDERS |
| 12-01-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary The Senior Civil Judge, Bhatkal dismissed two interim applications (I.A. Nos. I & II) filed by the plaintiff-appellant seeking temporary and mandatory injunctions against the defendant in a property easement dispute. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the trial court had already determined that the plaintiff could not prove an easementary right to use the defendant's property for access and had alternative means of reaching his property. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Senior Civil Judge, Bhatkal dismissed two interim applications (I.A. Nos. I & II) filed by the plaintiff-appellant seeking temporary and mandatory injunctions against the defendant in a property easement dispute. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as the trial court had already determined that the plaintiff could not prove an easementary right to use the defendant's property for access and had alternative means of reaching his property. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts