Poornima Naik vs Ramakrishna Naik — 3/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S26 O 7 R1,2. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK320000052024

ISSUES

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

3/2024

Filing Date

09-01-2024

Registration No

3/2024

Registration Date

20-01-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL

Judge

1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S26 O 7 R1,2

Petitioner(s)

Poornima Naik

Adv. N.S.R. Bhat

Respondent(s)

Ramakrishna Naik

Raghavendra Naik

Leena P.K

Hearing History

Judge: 1229-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BHATKAL

07-03-2026

ISSUES

06-03-2026

ISSUES

05-03-2026

ISSUES

28-02-2026

ISSUES

21-02-2026

ISSUES

Interim Orders

22-01-2024
IA Order
22-09-2025
Orders
22-09-2025
Orders

Case Summary Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. II) - DISMISSED The Senior Civil Judge, Bhatkal dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the three essential ingredients for granting temporary injunction: prima facie case, balance of convenience in her favor, and irreparable loss. The court noted that Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act protects the property while the suit is pending, making temporary injunction unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. II) - DISMISSED The Senior Civil Judge, Bhatkal dismissed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish the three essential ingredients for granting temporary injunction: prima facie case, balance of convenience in her favor, and irreparable loss. The court noted that Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act protects the property while the suit is pending, making temporary injunction unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case