The Janata Co-op Credit Society Ltd,Bhatkal-Rep., by its B.M Sri Vinod Manjunath Naik vs Mr. Abbas Ameer Shaikh — 3081/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310050232024

Filing Number

3081/2024

Filing Date

28-Dec-2024

Registration No

3081/2024

Registration Date

28-Dec-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

867-Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Janata Co-op Credit Society Ltd,Bhatkal-Rep., by its B.M Sri Vinod Manjunath Naik

    Adv. RAJESH IRAPPA NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Abbas Ameer Shaikh

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  9. 30-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  10. 16-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  12. 29-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case Number: CC 3081/2024 Outcome: The court examined witness PW-1 and found significant inconsistencies in their testimony regarding loan transactions, forged documents, and false cases filed against the respondent. The court concluded that the witness provided false statements to support fabricated claims and determined that documents (NIPs 1, 6, 8-10) were fraudulently created. The case is adjourned for further examination, with the court noting the witness gave contradictory evidence about loan disbursement, insurance claims, and related criminal cases (CC 75/2025 and 83/2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 29-Nov-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  17. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  18. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  19. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  20. 17-Jul-2025

    PleaView PDF

  21. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  22. 25-Jun-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  23. 03-May-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  24. 22-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  25. 06-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 28-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3081/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case Number: CC 3081/2024 Outcome: The court examined witness PW-1 and found significant inconsistencies in their testimony regarding loan transactions, forged documents, and false cases filed against the respondent. The court concluded that the witness provided false statements to support fabricated claims and determined that documents (NIPs 1, 6, 8-10) were fraudulently created. The case is adjourned for further examination, with the court noting the witness gave contradictory evidence about loan disbursement, insurance claims, and related criminal cases (CC 75/2025 and 83/2025). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case