The Janata Co-op Credit Society Ltd,Bhatkal-Rep., by its B. M Sri Vinod Manjunath Naik vs Noorulameen Sabbir Rodda s/o. Bustan Kwaboos — 3024/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310048752024

Filing Number

3024/2024

Filing Date

17-Dec-2024

Registration No

3024/2024

Registration Date

17-Dec-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

867-Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Janata Co-op Credit Society Ltd,Bhatkal-Rep., by its B. M Sri Vinod Manjunath Naik

    Adv. K V Bhairumane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Noorulameen Sabbir Rodda s/o. Bustan Kwaboos

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge, Bhatkal convicted the accused Noorullamin Shabbir Rodda under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,31,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found that the accused had borrowed a loan from Janata Co-operative Credit Society and issued the cheque to repay the debt, which was dishonored on presentation. The accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Act and provide cogent evidence supporting his defense of misuse. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,31,000 (or six months simple imprisonment in default), with the recovered amount to be paid as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    313 Statement

  8. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Deposition

  13. 04-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  14. 14-Nov-2025

    Deposition

  15. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  16. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  17. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  18. 29-Aug-2025

    Deposition

  19. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  21. 10-Jul-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  22. 30-May-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  23. 02-May-2025

    Steps

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  24. 05-Apr-2025

    Steps

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  25. 06-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  26. 22-Feb-2025

    Steps

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  27. 23-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 17-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3024/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Civil Judge, Bhatkal convicted the accused Noorullamin Shabbir Rodda under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 1,31,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The court found that the accused had borrowed a loan from Janata Co-operative Credit Society and issued the cheque to repay the debt, which was dishonored on presentation. The accused failed to rebut the presumption under Section 139 of the Act and provide cogent evidence supporting his defense of misuse. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,31,000 (or six months simple imprisonment in default), with the recovered amount to be paid as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case