The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Bhatkal vs Sri Mahammad Naseer Abu Mahammad Dabapu — 3485/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 26-Mar-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310046512025

Filing Number

718/2025

Filing Date

30-Oct-2025

Registration No

3485/2025

Registration Date

30-Oct-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

867-Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Bhatkal

    Adv. Damodar H Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Mahammad Naseer Abu Mahammad Dabapu

Case History

  1. 26-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary Case CC No. 3485/2025 underwent main trial on 06.03.2026, where the plaintiff's counsel presented various documents including a check from Canara Bank (No. 388585), bank statements, demand promissory notes, and payment receipts as evidence (marked as exhibits NP-1 through NP-11). The defendant's counsel requested an adjournment, which was granted, and the case was postponed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  7. 31-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 30-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3485/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Case CC No. 3485/2025 underwent main trial on 06.03.2026, where the plaintiff's counsel presented various documents including a check from Canara Bank (No. 388585), bank statements, demand promissory notes, and payment receipts as evidence (marked as exhibits NP-1 through NP-11). The defendant's counsel requested an adjournment, which was granted, and the case was postponed for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case