The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Bhatkal vs Smt. Rafiya Tehaseen Mohammad Fayaz — 3458/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: NBW To Accused. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

NBW To Accused Next hearing 23-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310045462025

Filing Number

682/2025

Filing Date

27-Oct-2025

Registration No

3458/2025

Registration Date

27-Oct-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

867-Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Janata Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd. Bhatkal

    Adv. Udaya Honnappa Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Rafiya Tehaseen Mohammad Fayaz

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  3. 17-Jan-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  4. 04-Dec-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Addl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 28-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    The court order dated 28-10-2025 in P.C.R. No. 682/2025 pertains to an affidavit submitted by the petitioner through counsel U.H.N., confirming that all statements made in the affidavit are true and correct. The court approved the affidavit and directed that criminal proceedings be initiated against the respondent accordingly. The order was signed by the Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3458/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court order dated 28-10-2025 in P.C.R. No. 682/2025 pertains to an affidavit submitted by the petitioner through counsel U.H.N., confirming that all statements made in the affidavit are true and correct. The court approved the affidavit and directed that criminal proceedings be initiated against the respondent accordingly. The order was signed by the Judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case