Grameena Vyavasaya Sahakari Sangh Ltd vs Sri Prakash Durgappa Naik , Major — 3440/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK310045452025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
681/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
3440/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA
Judge
523-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Grameena Vyavasaya Sahakari Sangh Ltd
Adv. RAJESH IRAPPA NAIK
Respondent(s)
Sri Prakash Durgappa Naik , Major
Hearing History
Judge: 523-PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 28-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 08-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case 3440/2025 Summary Grameena Vyavasaya Sahakari Sangh Ltd v. Sri Prakash Durgappa Naik (Major) The court heard witness testimony on 12/05/2026 in this civil matter involving loan disputes. The petitioner's representative testified regarding an overdraft loan of ₹2,00,000 advanced to the respondent, with security deposits of ₹10,000 (shares) and ₹30,000 (FD), and claimed the respondent fully repaid the loan. Issues regarding check discrepancies, alleged false criminal case filing by the respondent, and document authentication were raised. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 3440/2025 Summary Grameena Vyavasaya Sahakari Sangh Ltd v. Sri Prakash Durgappa Naik (Major) The court heard witness testimony on 12/05/2026 in this civil matter involving loan disputes. The petitioner's representative testified regarding an overdraft loan of ₹2,00,000 advanced to the respondent, with security deposits of ₹10,000 (shares) and ₹30,000 (FD), and claimed the respondent fully repaid the loan. Issues regarding check discrepancies, alleged false criminal case filing by the respondent, and document authentication were raised. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts