Gurukrupa Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd vs Ganesh Kumar Naik, Major — 3136/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 04th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK310041022025
Filing Number
612/2025
Filing Date
04-10-2025
Registration No
3136/2025
Registration Date
04-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA
Judge
867-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gurukrupa Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd
Adv. RAJESH IRAPPA NAIK
Respondent(s)
Ganesh Kumar Naik, Major
Hearing History
Judge: 867-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 3136/2025 The court convicted Ganesh Kumar Naik under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (No. 704076 for Rs. 1,09,246) dated 28-07-2025 that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was issued for discharge of a loan debt, was returned unpaid, proper notice was served, and the accused failed to respond or provide credible evidence to rebut the presumptions under Sections 118-139 of the Act. Naik was sentenced to pay a fine equal to the cheque amount, with six months simple imprisonment as default, and the recovered fine ordered as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 3136/2025 The court convicted Ganesh Kumar Naik under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (No. 704076 for Rs. 1,09,246) dated 28-07-2025 that was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The court found that all statutory requirements were satisfied: the cheque was issued for discharge of a loan debt, was returned unpaid, proper notice was served, and the accused failed to respond or provide credible evidence to rebut the presumptions under Sections 118-139 of the Act. Naik was sentenced to pay a fine equal to the cheque amount, with six months simple imprisonment as default, and the recovered fine ordered as compensation to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts