Bhatkal Souhardha Niyamith, Bhatkal - Rep., by its Manager Ravi Sukrayya Naik vs Riyanbi Mehaboob Sab, Major — 2190/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: NBW To Accused. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

NBW To Accused Next hearing 18-Jun-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310036142024

Filing Number

2190/2024

Filing Date

01-Oct-2024

Registration No

2190/2024

Registration Date

01-Oct-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

523-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhatkal Souhardha Niyamith, Bhatkal - Rep., by its Manager Ravi Sukrayya Naik

    Adv. Manoj Manjunath Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Riyanbi Mehaboob Sab, Major

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  3. 06-Apr-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case 2190/2024 Summary In this civil case between Bhatkal Souhardha Niyamith (petitioner) and Riyanbi Mehaboob Sab (respondent), the court heard witness testimony on 13/03/2026 regarding a loan dispute. The petitioner claimed to have lent Rs. 60,000 for home repairs with 10% interest, and alleged the respondent obtained a check fraudulently and defaulted on repayment, leaving Rs. 61,000 outstanding. The court found insufficient connection between the respondent and alleged fraudulent check case. The matter is adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  12. 29-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  14. 17-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  15. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  17. 16-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  18. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  19. 16-Jul-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  20. 23-Jun-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  21. 12-May-2025

    Steps

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  25. 18-Feb-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  26. 01-Feb-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  27. 16-Jan-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  28. 24-Dec-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  29. 27-Nov-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  30. 06-Nov-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  31. 05-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 01-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2190/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 2190/2024 Summary In this civil case between Bhatkal Souhardha Niyamith (petitioner) and Riyanbi Mehaboob Sab (respondent), the court heard witness testimony on 13/03/2026 regarding a loan dispute. The petitioner claimed to have lent Rs. 60,000 for home repairs with 10% interest, and alleged the respondent obtained a check fraudulently and defaulted on repayment, leaving Rs. 61,000 outstanding. The court found insufficient connection between the respondent and alleged fraudulent check case. The matter is adjourned for further examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case