MERAJ PEERZADA SO MIRAN MOHAMMED PEERZADA vs BIBI ZUBAIDA WO MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANGAVALI — 1061/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417,419,420,423,465,467,468,471,149. Status: NBW To Accused. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

NBW To Accused Next hearing 27-Jun-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310027342019

Filing Number

1061/2019

Filing Date

14-Oct-2019

Registration No

1061/2019

Registration Date

14-Oct-2019

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

523-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

69

Police Station

BHATKALA TOWN PS

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 417,419,420,423,465,467,468,471,149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MERAJ PEERZADA SO MIRAN MOHAMMED PEERZADA

    Adv. J D BHAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIBI ZUBAIDA WO MOHAMMED IBRAHIM GANGAVALI

  2. 2.NOORJAHAN PEERZADE WO MOHAMMED PEERZADE

  3. 3.FAQUI IMAIL PEERZADE SO MOHAMMED SAHEB PEERZADA

  4. 4.ABDUL REHAMAN PEERZADE SO MOHAMMED SAHEB PEERZADE

  5. 5.AMEER HAMZA PEERZADE SO MOHAMMED SAHEB PEERZADE

  6. 6.AHMED MUZAMILLA PEERZADE

  7. 7.AHMED MUDASSIR SO MOHAMMED SAHEB PEERZADE

  8. 8.RASHIDA BAINDOORI WO BURHANUDDIN BASHA

  9. 9.KHATJATUL QUBRA WO SYED SALEEM

  10. 10.AYESHATUL HUMAIRA WO ZAINUL ABIDEEN FAROOKI

  11. 11.ABUBAKAR SHAIKH

  12. 12.ABDUL ZABBAR SO USMAN GHANI ASKERI

Case History

  1. 27-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  8. 02-Sep-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  9. 30-Jun-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  10. 28-Apr-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  11. 26-Apr-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  12. 01-Apr-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  13. 14-Mar-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  14. 22-Feb-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  15. 30-Jan-2025

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  16. 30-Nov-2024

    Await Records

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  17. 30-Sep-2024

    Await Records

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  18. 31-Jul-2024

    Await Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  19. 26-Jun-2024

    Await Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  20. 06-Jun-2024

    Await Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  21. 13-Mar-2024

    Await Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  22. 15-Feb-2024

    Await Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  23. 20-Dec-2023

    Await Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  24. 21-Oct-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  25. 02-Sep-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  26. 04-Aug-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  27. 10-Jul-2023

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 1061/2019 The court rejected an application by Accused No. 12 seeking discharge from charges under IPC sections 417, 419, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468, and 471 (forgery and fraud offenses). Accused No. 12 argued he was merely a bona fide purchaser who bought property through a registered sale deed dated 24-01-2015 and had no involvement in creating forged gift deeds or other fraudulent documents. The court found prima facie grounds existed to proceed against him, holding that at the pre-trial stage, strong suspicion supported by material evidence suffices to frame charges. The court noted the principle "caveat emptor" (buyer beware) applies and that Accused No. 12 should have verified documents before purchase, therefore rejecting his discharge application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  28. 10-Jul-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  29. 05-Jul-2023

    Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  30. 17-Jun-2023

    Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  31. 15-Jun-2023

    Null

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  32. 08-Jun-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  33. 24-May-2023

    Orders

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  34. 03-May-2023

    Hearing

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  35. 02-May-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  36. 28-Apr-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  37. 23-Mar-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  38. 02-Mar-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  39. 20-Feb-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  40. 17-Feb-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  41. 10-Feb-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  42. 21-Jan-2023

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  43. 26-Dec-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  44. 30-Nov-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  45. 23-Nov-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  46. 18-Nov-2022

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  47. 23-Sep-2022

    Objection

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  48. 22-Jun-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  49. 17-May-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  50. 16-Apr-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  51. 06-Apr-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  52. 01-Feb-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  53. 26-Jul-2021

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  54. 11-May-2021

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  55. 22-Mar-2021

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  56. 20-Jan-2021

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  57. 21-Dec-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  58. 21-Oct-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  59. 01-Sep-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  60. 08-Jul-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  61. 08-Jun-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  62. 18-May-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  63. 04-May-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  64. 15-Apr-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  65. 31-Mar-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  66. 25-Feb-2020

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  67. 17-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  68. 14-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  69. 05-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 14-Oct-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1061/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 1061/2019 The court rejected an application by Accused No. 12 seeking discharge from charges under IPC sections 417, 419, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468, and 471 (forgery and fraud offenses). Accused No. 12 argued he was merely a bona fide purchaser who bought property through a registered sale deed dated 24-01-2015 and had no involvement in creating forged gift deeds or other fraudulent documents. The court found prima facie grounds existed to proceed against him, holding that at the pre-trial stage, strong suspicion supported by material evidence suffices to frame charges. The court noted the principle "caveat emptor" (buyer beware) applies and that Accused No. 12 should have verified documents before purchase, therefore rejecting his discharge application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case