St. Milagres Credit Souhardha Co-Operative Ltd vs Mr. Dinakar Govind Kharvi — 1813/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK310025022025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

08th April 2026

Filing Number

388/2025

Filing Date

01-07-2025

Registration No

1813/2025

Registration Date

01-07-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

867-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

St. Milagres Credit Souhardha Co-Operative Ltd

Adv. Simon Leen Dsouza

Respondent(s)

Mr. Dinakar Govind Kharvi

Hearing History

Judge: 867-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL

18-03-2026

EVIDENCE

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE

31-01-2026

AWAIT REPORT

Interim Orders

02-07-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
Plea
20-11-2025
Plea
28-11-2025
Deposition
19-12-2025
Deposition

Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 1813/2025, the court examined a loan dispute involving a society. The respondent (APP), employed as a junior assistant for 5 years, borrowed funds from the plaintiff society for personal business purposes. The loan comprised 36 installments, of which 19 have been paid, leaving approximately 19,000-20,000 rupees outstanding. The court recorded the testimony of Witness PW-1 and noted disputes regarding interest calculations (15% annual vs. 3.75% quarterly). The case was adjourned with the respondent's counsel granted further time to present arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 1813/2025, the court examined a loan dispute involving a society. The respondent (APP), employed as a junior assistant for 5 years, borrowed funds from the plaintiff society for personal business purposes. The loan comprised 36 installments, of which 19 have been paid, leaving approximately 19,000-20,000 rupees outstanding. The court recorded the testimony of Witness PW-1 and noted disputes regarding interest calculations (15% annual vs. 3.75% quarterly). The case was adjourned with the respondent's counsel granted further time to present arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case