St. Milagres Credit Souhardha Co-Operative Ltd vs Mr. Dinakar Govind Kharvi — 1813/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK310025022025
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
388/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
1813/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA
Judge
867-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
St. Milagres Credit Souhardha Co-Operative Ltd
Adv. Simon Leen Dsouza
Respondent(s)
Mr. Dinakar Govind Kharvi
Hearing History
Judge: 867-ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT BHATKAL
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
AWAIT REPORT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-01-2026 | AWAIT REPORT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 1813/2025, the court examined a loan dispute involving a society. The respondent (APP), employed as a junior assistant for 5 years, borrowed funds from the plaintiff society for personal business purposes. The loan comprised 36 installments, of which 19 have been paid, leaving approximately 19,000-20,000 rupees outstanding. The court recorded the testimony of Witness PW-1 and noted disputes regarding interest calculations (15% annual vs. 3.75% quarterly). The case was adjourned with the respondent's counsel granted further time to present arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Civil Case No. 1813/2025, the court examined a loan dispute involving a society. The respondent (APP), employed as a junior assistant for 5 years, borrowed funds from the plaintiff society for personal business purposes. The loan comprised 36 installments, of which 19 have been paid, leaving approximately 19,000-20,000 rupees outstanding. The court recorded the testimony of Witness PW-1 and noted disputes regarding interest calculations (15% annual vs. 3.75% quarterly). The case was adjourned with the respondent's counsel granted further time to present arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts