Shri Varada Souhardha Credit Co-Operative Society vs Sri Mohammed Mujahid s/o. Mohammed Abidulla Shaikh , Major — 167/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CRIMINAL CASE on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINTS

CNR: KAUK310014852026

Filing Number

167/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

167/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BHATKALA

Judge

523-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS CRIMINAL CASE

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Varada Souhardha Credit Co-Operative Society

    Adv. Narayan M Naik

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Mohammed Mujahid s/o. Mohammed Abidulla Shaikh , Major

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court took cognizance of the complaint filed by Shri Varada Souhardha Credit Co-Operative Society against Sri Mohammed Mujahid for an alleged cheque bouncing offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After the complainant testified and submitted supporting documents (Ex.P-1 to Ex.P-12), the court found sufficient grounds for prosecution. The case was registered as a criminal case, and summons were ordered to be issued to the accused for appearance on 25.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC Court Bhatkal

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court took cognizance of the complaint filed by Shri Varada Souhardha Credit Co-Operative Society against Sri Mohammed Mujahid for an alleged cheque bouncing offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After the complainant testified and submitted supporting documents (Ex.P-1 to Ex.P-12), the court found sufficient grounds for prosecution. The case was registered as a criminal case, and summons were ordered to be issued to the accused for appearance on 25.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case