The Ankola Urban Co-oprative Bank Limited, Ankola vs Shri. Nandarajakishore Ashok Anvekar — 190/2022
Case under 498A of Ipc Section 138. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK220005552022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
190/2022
Filing Date
13-12-2022
Registration No
190/2022
Registration Date
13-12-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Ankola Urban Co-oprative Bank Limited, Ankola
Adv. R.K.bhat
Respondent(s)
Shri. Nandarajakishore Ashok Anvekar
Hearing History
Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
A.D.R.
Payment
A.D.R.
Payment
Payment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 22-05-2026 | Payment |
| 22-04-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 04-04-2026 | Payment |
| 24-03-2026 | Payment |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 190/2022 On 30-06-2025, the court heard witness testimony (PW-1) in this case between The Ankola Urban Cooperative Bank Limited (petitioner) and Shri. Nandarajakishore Ashok Anvekar (respondent). The witness testified regarding the bank's authority structure, board resolutions, and the respondent's authorization to represent the bank in court proceedings. The court recorded that no documentary evidence supporting the respondent's authority to represent the bank was produced before the court. The case was subsequently adjourned, with the respondent's counsel granted additional time to respond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 190/2022 On 30-06-2025, the court heard witness testimony (PW-1) in this case between The Ankola Urban Cooperative Bank Limited (petitioner) and Shri. Nandarajakishore Ashok Anvekar (respondent). The witness testified regarding the bank's authority structure, board resolutions, and the respondent's authorization to represent the bank in court proceedings. The court recorded that no documentary evidence supporting the respondent's authority to represent the bank was produced before the court. The case was subsequently adjourned, with the respondent's counsel granted additional time to respond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts