Jaysheree Mahesh Bhat vs Jagdish Dhananjaya Hegde — 20/2022
Case under 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 of C.p.c. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK220003202022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
20/2022
Filing Date
07-11-2022
Registration No
20/2022
Registration Date
07-11-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaysheree Mahesh Bhat
Adv. N.R.Bhat
Respondent(s)
Jagdish Dhananjaya Hegde
Mahadevi Kom Dhananjaya Hegde
Hearing History
Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 20/2022 Date: 09-02-2026 Parties: Jaysheree Mahesh Bhat (Petitioner) vs. Jagdish Dhananjaya Hegde and Mahadevi Kom Dhananjaya Hegde (Respondents) Order: The case was adjourned. The petitioner's testimony regarding disputes over property ownership and assets was recorded on 09-02-2026. The petitioner was examined regarding claims about a 6-gunthe property in Yallapur city, government land acquisition, and a building construction project valued at 30-38 lakhs. The court directed the petitioner to produce pending documentary evidence relating to the disputed properties in future hearings, and the matter was posted for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 20/2022 Date: 09-02-2026 Parties: Jaysheree Mahesh Bhat (Petitioner) vs. Jagdish Dhananjaya Hegde and Mahadevi Kom Dhananjaya Hegde (Respondents) Order: The case was adjourned. The petitioner's testimony regarding disputes over property ownership and assets was recorded on 09-02-2026. The petitioner was examined regarding claims about a 6-gunthe property in Yallapur city, government land acquisition, and a building construction project valued at 30-38 lakhs. The court directed the petitioner to produce pending documentary evidence relating to the disputed properties in future hearings, and the matter was posted for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts