State by RFO Mastikatta vs Roshan Ullas Naik — 68/2023

Case under Karnataka Forest Act 1963 Section 24. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK220002982023

Filing Number

68/2023

Filing Date

21-Nov-2023

Registration No

68/2023

Registration Date

21-Nov-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

9

Police Station

MASTIKATTA FOREST

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Forest Act 1963 Section 24
Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 9,39,51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State by RFO Mastikatta

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Roshan Ullas Naik

  2. 2.Amit Kamalakar Talekar

  3. 3.Santhosh Noona Talekar

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-May-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 68/2023 Outcome: The court recorded the testimony of witnesses on 20-02-2026 and found the petitioner's (RFO Mastikatta's) case to be based on false and fabricated evidence. The court concluded that the investigation was conducted with malice and bias against the respondents (Roshan Ullas Naik, Amit Kamalakar Talekar, and Santhosh Noona Talekar), particularly to implicate Respondent 1 in a wildlife case involving an alleged deer killing. Key Findings: The court determined that the investigation lacked credible evidence, the crime scene investigation was not properly conducted, photographic evidence was fabricated, and witness statements were contradictory and unreliable. The court found that the entire case was constructed based on animosity rather than genuine evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  15. 07-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  17. 17-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  18. 17-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  19. 12-Sep-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  20. 22-Aug-2025

    Objection

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  21. 25-Jul-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  22. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  23. 04-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  24. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  25. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  26. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    Objection

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  28. 28-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 28-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  30. 21-Feb-2025

    A.D.R.

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  31. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  32. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  33. 03-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  34. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  35. 08-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  36. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  37. 04-Oct-2024

    H.B.C.

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  38. 20-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  39. 13-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  40. 30-Aug-2024

    H.B.C.

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  41. 09-Aug-2024

    H.B.C.

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  42. 19-Jul-2024

    H.B.C.

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  43. 07-Jun-2024

    NBW to Accused

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  44. 19-Apr-2024

    NBW to Accused

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  45. 15-Mar-2024

    NBW to Accused

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  46. 09-Feb-2024

    NBW to Accused

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  47. 19-Jan-2024

    NBW to Accused

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  48. 22-Dec-2023

    H.B.C.

    Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

  49. 21-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  50. 21-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 68/2023 Outcome: The court recorded the testimony of witnesses on 20-02-2026 and found the petitioner's (RFO Mastikatta's) case to be based on false and fabricated evidence. The court concluded that the investigation was conducted with malice and bias against the respondents (Roshan Ullas Naik, Amit Kamalakar Talekar, and Santhosh Noona Talekar), particularly to implicate Respondent 1 in a wildlife case involving an alleged deer killing. Key Findings: The court determined that the investigation lacked credible evidence, the crime scene investigation was not properly conducted, photographic evidence was fabricated, and witness statements were contradictory and unreliable. The court found that the entire case was constructed based on animosity rather than genuine evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case