State by RFO Mastikatta vs Roshan Ullas Naik — 68/2023

Case Summary: CC 68/2023 Outcome: The court recorded the testimony of witnesses on 20-02-2026 and found the petitioner's (RFO Mastikatta's) case to be based on false and fabricated evidence. The court concluded that the investigation was conducted with malice and bias against the respondents (Roshan Ullas Naik, Amit Kamalakar Talekar, and Santhosh Noona Talekar), particularly to implicate Respondent 1 in a wildlife case involving an alleged deer killing. Key Findings: The court determined that the investigation lacked credible evidence, the crime scene investigation was not properly conducted, photographic evidence was fabricated, and witness statements were contradictory and unreliable. The court found that the entire case was constructed based on animosity rather than genuine evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.