SUPRABHATA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD., vs Ravi Vishnu Naik — 85/2024
Case under 498A of Ipc Section 138. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK220002622024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
85/2024
Filing Date
22-09-2021
Registration No
85/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUPRABHATA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD.,
Adv. Sri. Narayan .Ramakrishna NAYAK
Respondent(s)
Ravi Vishnu Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
SUMMONS
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 01-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 25-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 85/2024 Case: Civil Case No. 85/2024 Petitioner: Suprabhata Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd. Respondent: Ravi Vishnu Naik Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Ankola Date: 24-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a loan of Rs. 5 lakhs provided by the petitioner cooperative society to the respondent. The court found that the respondent issued an invalid/post-dated check (an SBM bank check that lost validity after 31-12-2017) with insufficient funds, and the court determined the respondent had no genuine entitlement to the loan. The court accepted the petitioner's claims and concluded that the respondent falsely claimed receipt of funds and filed a false case, with no further cross-examination being required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 85/2024 Case: Civil Case No. 85/2024 Petitioner: Suprabhata Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd. Respondent: Ravi Vishnu Naik Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Ankola Date: 24-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a loan of Rs. 5 lakhs provided by the petitioner cooperative society to the respondent. The court found that the respondent issued an invalid/post-dated check (an SBM bank check that lost validity after 31-12-2017) with insufficient funds, and the court determined the respondent had no genuine entitlement to the loan. The court accepted the petitioner's claims and concluded that the respondent falsely claimed receipt of funds and filed a false case, with no further cross-examination being required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts