SUPRABHATA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD., vs Ravi Vishnu Naik — 85/2024

Case under 498A of Ipc Section 138. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK220002622024

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

85/2024

Filing Date

22-09-2021

Registration No

85/2024

Registration Date

07-06-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

Acts & Sections

498A of Ipc Section 138

Petitioner(s)

SUPRABHATA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD.,

Adv. Sri. Narayan .Ramakrishna NAYAK

Respondent(s)

Ravi Vishnu Naik

Hearing History

Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

23-04-2026

SUMMONS

01-04-2026

ORDERS

25-03-2026

HEARING

13-03-2026

HEARING

11-03-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

18-10-2025
Deposition
24-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary: 85/2024 Case: Civil Case No. 85/2024 Petitioner: Suprabhata Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd. Respondent: Ravi Vishnu Naik Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Ankola Date: 24-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a loan of Rs. 5 lakhs provided by the petitioner cooperative society to the respondent. The court found that the respondent issued an invalid/post-dated check (an SBM bank check that lost validity after 31-12-2017) with insufficient funds, and the court determined the respondent had no genuine entitlement to the loan. The court accepted the petitioner's claims and concluded that the respondent falsely claimed receipt of funds and filed a false case, with no further cross-examination being required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 85/2024 Case: Civil Case No. 85/2024 Petitioner: Suprabhata Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd. Respondent: Ravi Vishnu Naik Court: Senior Civil Judge & JMFC, Ankola Date: 24-02-2026 Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a loan of Rs. 5 lakhs provided by the petitioner cooperative society to the respondent. The court found that the respondent issued an invalid/post-dated check (an SBM bank check that lost validity after 31-12-2017) with insufficient funds, and the court determined the respondent had no genuine entitlement to the loan. The court accepted the petitioner's claims and concluded that the respondent falsely claimed receipt of funds and filed a false case, with no further cross-examination being required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case