State By RFO Mastikatta vs Manikanta Manjunath Nayak — 23/2023
Case under Karnataka Forest Act 1963 Section 24e,144,165. Status: NBW to Accused. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK220001022023
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
23/2023
Filing Date
21-04-2023
Registration No
23/2023
Registration Date
21-04-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
FIR Details
FIR Number
2
Police Station
MASTIKATTA FOREST
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State By RFO Mastikatta
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Manikanta Manjunath Nayak
Mahesh Anant Gouda
Manjunath Venkanna Nayak
Hearing History
Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
NBW to Accused
NBW to Accused
NOTICE
NBW to Accused
NBW to Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | NBW to Accused |
| 13-03-2026 | NBW to Accused |
| 30-01-2026 | NOTICE |
| 05-12-2025 | NBW to Accused |
| 07-11-2025 | NBW to Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 23/2023 State By RFO Mastikatta v. Manikanta Manjunath Nayak and others On 29-11-2024, the court recorded witness testimony and examined evidence including forest patrol documents, photographs of four wildlife (sambar deer) specimens found in the forest, and route maps. The court registered exhibits detailing measurements and locations where the animals were allegedly killed 300 meters within the forest. The case proceeding involved examination of respondent statements regarding poaching activities, with evidence marked as exhibits PI-2 through PI-12. The court adjourned the case for further cross-examination of witnesses by respondent's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 23/2023 State By RFO Mastikatta v. Manikanta Manjunath Nayak and others On 29-11-2024, the court recorded witness testimony and examined evidence including forest patrol documents, photographs of four wildlife (sambar deer) specimens found in the forest, and route maps. The court registered exhibits detailing measurements and locations where the animals were allegedly killed 300 meters within the forest. The case proceeding involved examination of respondent statements regarding poaching activities, with evidence marked as exhibits PI-2 through PI-12. The court adjourned the case for further cross-examination of witnesses by respondent's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts