THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs Ashok Krishana Naik — 13/2025
Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section 32,34,38(A). Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK220000972025
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
13/2025
Filing Date
25-04-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
25-04-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Annappa Ramachandra Naik
Respondent(s)
Ashok Krishana Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-01-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary This is a witness examination record from the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Court in Ankola (Karnataka) dated December 12, 2025. The witness Ravi Raj Naik, a 59-year-old excise inspector from Haveri, testified regarding a search operation on March 21, 2024, during Lok Sabha elections, where foreign liquor bottles (whisky) were recovered from the accused's house. The court recorded the witness's detailed account of the search procedure, seizure of evidence, and chemical examination reports, while also addressing cross-examination objections from the accused's counsel challenging the witness's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary This is a witness examination record from the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Court in Ankola (Karnataka) dated December 12, 2025. The witness Ravi Raj Naik, a 59-year-old excise inspector from Haveri, testified regarding a search operation on March 21, 2024, during Lok Sabha elections, where foreign liquor bottles (whisky) were recovered from the accused's house. The court recorded the witness's detailed account of the search procedure, seizure of evidence, and chemical examination reports, while also addressing cross-examination objections from the accused's counsel challenging the witness's account. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts