State By RFO Mastikatta vs Rajesh Chandru Padti Aliyas Rajesh Chandru Goankar — 11/2025

Case under Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 55. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK220000552025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

11/2025

Filing Date

21-03-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

21-03-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

Acts & Sections

Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 55

Petitioner(s)

State By RFO Mastikatta

Adv. Annappa Ramachandra Naik

Respondent(s)

Rajesh Chandru Padti Aliyas Rajesh Chandru Goankar

Santhosh Datta Padti

Hearing History

Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

22-12-2025

EVIDENCE

12-12-2025

ORDERS

Interim Orders

22-12-2025
Orders
30-01-2026
Deposition
13-02-2026
Deposition

The court order, dated 13-02-2026, is a judicial examination of witness testimony in a wildlife case (C.C. No. 11-25, P.W-1) before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC in Ankola. The judge extensively scrutinizes the investigating officer's testimony and concludes that the entire investigation is fabricated, finding numerous inconsistencies, false statements, and manufactured evidence (including doctored photographs). The court determines that a false case was deliberately created against the accused regarding an alleged wildlife killing, with deliberate falsification of facts and procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order, dated 13-02-2026, is a judicial examination of witness testimony in a wildlife case (C.C. No. 11-25, P.W-1) before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC in Ankola. The judge extensively scrutinizes the investigating officer's testimony and concludes that the entire investigation is fabricated, finding numerous inconsistencies, false statements, and manufactured evidence (including doctored photographs). The court determines that a false case was deliberately created against the accused regarding an alleged wildlife killing, with deliberate falsification of facts and procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case