Seetabai Kom Ramchandra Naik vs U.F.M Dayanand Krishna Naik — 1/2023
Case under 7 Rule 1 R/w Section 26 of C.p.c. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK220000152023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
1/2023
Filing Date
16-01-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
16-01-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seetabai Kom Ramchandra Naik
Adv. Manjunath Parameshwar Bhat
Santosh Ramchandra Naik
Ravi Ramchandra Naik
Usha @ Deepa Kom Anandu Naik
Savita @ Vinuta Kom Vinayak Naik
Lata @ Sandya Kom Umesh Naik
Respondent(s)
U.F.M Dayanand Krishna Naik
Bhaskar Vasudev Naik
Kashinath Vasudev Naik
Maruti Vasudev Naik
Puja Kom Suresh Naik
Prakash Gopu Naik
Vindod Peeru Naik
Madukar Satu Naik
Jagadeesh Satu Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1228-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Ankola
ISSUES
SUMMONS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | ISSUES |
| 15-04-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 07-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 04-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case 1/2023 Summary On 02-03-2026, the court heard testimony in this property dispute involving family members. The court found that respondents 6, 8, and 9 made false statements regarding their property rights and attempted family division. The court determined that respondents obtained signatures under false pretenses (via document NID-14) and are unlawfully preventing petitioners from selling their property share. The case continues with further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1/2023 Summary On 02-03-2026, the court heard testimony in this property dispute involving family members. The court found that respondents 6, 8, and 9 made false statements regarding their property rights and attempted family division. The court determined that respondents obtained signatures under false pretenses (via document NID-14) and are unlawfully preventing petitioners from selling their property share. The case continues with further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts