Mohammed Iliyas Shaikh Hussain vs Ibrahim Mohammed Shaikh — 143/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7,Rule.1,3,5nd7,R/W.Sec.26. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210021232024
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
146/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
143/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammed Iliyas Shaikh Hussain
Adv. H.S. Shaikh, Advocate
Respondent(s)
Ibrahim Mohammed Shaikh
Nawaz Ahamed Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 17-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 19-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 18-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 05-12-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary OS No. 143/2024 - Civil Judge, Ankola The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants and anyone claiming under them from interfering with or entering the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property. The plaintiff, who claims 45 years of possession and an oral gift of the property in 2004, produced prima facie evidence including police acknowledgment and tax documents supporting his possession. The injunction remains valid until the application is disposed of on merits, subject to the plaintiff complying with conditions including service of documents on defendants and filing an affidavit of compliance; notice and summons to defendants will follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary OS No. 143/2024 - Civil Judge, Ankola The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants and anyone claiming under them from interfering with or entering the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the suit property. The plaintiff, who claims 45 years of possession and an oral gift of the property in 2004, produced prima facie evidence including police acknowledgment and tax documents supporting his possession. The injunction remains valid until the application is disposed of on merits, subject to the plaintiff complying with conditions including service of documents on defendants and filing an affidavit of compliance; notice and summons to defendants will follow. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts