Baliya Neela Naik vs Sarita Chandru Ager — 795/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: N.B.W.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK210020252024

N.B.W.

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

795/2024

Filing Date

02-12-2024

Registration No

795/2024

Registration Date

02-12-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Baliya Neela Naik

Adv. Monish Anandagiri

Respondent(s)

Sarita Chandru Ager

Hearing History

Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

15-04-2026

N.B.W.

13-03-2026

N.B.W.

20-02-2026

Setlment

13-01-2026

Cross Exam

23-12-2025

Cross Exam

Interim Orders

02-09-2025
313 Statement

Case Summary: CC No. 795/2024 This is a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Petitioner Baliya Neela Naik lent ₹50,000 to respondent Sarita Chandru Ager on 28-11-2021 with agreement for repayment within six months. On 30-07-2024, the accused issued cheque no. 122405 for ₹50,000, which bounced with "Funds Insufficient" message. Despite prior notice, the accused failed to repay. The court recorded the accused's statement under CrPC Section 313 on 02-09-2025, with the accused declining to offer any defense or present witnesses or documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 795/2024 This is a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Petitioner Baliya Neela Naik lent ₹50,000 to respondent Sarita Chandru Ager on 28-11-2021 with agreement for repayment within six months. On 30-07-2024, the accused issued cheque no. 122405 for ₹50,000, which bounced with "Funds Insufficient" message. Despite prior notice, the accused failed to repay. The court recorded the accused's statement under CrPC Section 313 on 02-09-2025, with the accused declining to offer any defense or present witnesses or documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case