PRATHVI SOUHARDA CREDIT SAHAKARI N., Ankola R/by Recovery Officer Sri. Devanand Bommayya Nayak vs Nagamma Toku Ager — 687/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 16th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK210018152024

Case disposed

Filing Number

297/2024

Filing Date

11-11-2024

Registration No

687/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

PRATHVI SOUHARDA CREDIT SAHAKARI N., Ankola R/by Recovery Officer Sri. Devanand Bommayya Nayak

Adv. Narayan Ramakrishna Nayak

Respondent(s)

Nagamma Toku Ager

Hearing History

Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

Cross Exam

26-02-2026

Cross Exam

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgment

SUMMARY: Case C.C.No. 687/2025 The court convicted Nagamma Toku Ager of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused borrowed ₹2,90,000 from Prathvi Souharda Credit Sahakari and issued cheque no. 704702 for ₹3,20,611 which was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds; she failed to respond to the legal notice demanding payment. The court sentenced her to pay ₹3,60,446 as fine to the complainant (comprising cheque amount plus interest), with six months imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

06-01-2026
Plea
06-01-2026
313 Statement
26-02-2026
Deposition
12-03-2026
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: Case C.C.No. 687/2025 The court convicted Nagamma Toku Ager of cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused borrowed ₹2,90,000 from Prathvi Souharda Credit Sahakari and issued cheque no. 704702 for ₹3,20,611 which was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds; she failed to respond to the legal notice demanding payment. The court sentenced her to pay ₹3,60,446 as fine to the complainant (comprising cheque amount plus interest), with six months imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case