Digambar Khemu Gouda vs D-1. Janaki Vasanth Gouda — 66/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1,2,R/w.Sec.26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210017622021
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
66/2021
Filing Date
26-11-2021
Registration No
66/2021
Registration Date
26-11-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Digambar Khemu Gouda
Adv. SHRI. VINOD VITTAL SHANBHAG
Respondent(s)
D-1. Janaki Vasanth Gouda
D-2. Vinod Vasant Gouda
D-3. Indira Madev Gouda
D-4. Manjula Ganapati Gouda
D-5. Sudhakar Khemu Gouda
D-6. Gulabi Pandurang Gouda
D-7. Malini Gopal Gouda
D-8. Uma Govind Gouda
D-9. Meera Shamba Gouda
D-10. Rama Yadav Gouda
D-11. Gange Lingu Gouda
D-12. Meeri Anant Gouda
D-13. Thaku Lingu Gouda
D-14. Rami Sukru Gouda(Legal Heir)
D-15. Geeta Ira Gouda
D-16. Prakash Ira Gouda
D-17. Ramesh Ira Gouda
D-18. Radha Ira Gouda
D-19. Yada Khyama Gouda
D-20. Sumitra Deepak Gouda
D-21. Janaki Kuslu Gouda
D-22. Tekhi Laxman Gouda
D-23. Shyamala Santosh Gouda
D-24. Kumar Kuslu Gouda
D-25. Savita Kuslu Gouda
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 66/2021, the court adjourned the case to 05-03-2026 for further examination of witnesses and recording of their statements. The court found that the plaintiff's claims regarding false evidence and false witnesses presented to deprive him of property rights need further investigation, and the case will continue with witness examination at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 66/2021, the court adjourned the case to 05-03-2026 for further examination of witnesses and recording of their statements. The court found that the plaintiff's claims regarding false evidence and false witnesses presented to deprive him of property rights need further investigation, and the case will continue with witness examination at the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts