Smt. Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga vs Smt. Shaila Mahabaleshwar Gunaga — 122/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7,Rule.1,RWS.26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210017122025
Filing Number
122/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
122/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga
Adv. A N TALAGERI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Shaila Mahabaleshwar Gunaga
-
2.Smt. Keertana Krishnanand Gunaga
-
3.Sanjeev Ganapati Gunaga
-
4.Suprasanna Virendra Gunaga
-
5.Subramanya Virendra Gunaga
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) accepted a joint settlement memorandum between the petitioner Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga and defendants (her siblings and their children) in a property dispute. All defendants relinquished their rights to the suit property in favor of the petitioner as a gesture of family harmony, making her the absolute owner; defendants agreed never to claim rights over the property in future. The court decreed the petitioner's suit and issued a final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola
-
13-Mar-2026
Lokadalat
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola
-
10-Feb-2026
A.D.R.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola
-
09-Jan-2026
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola
-
11-Dec-2025
Summons
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 122/2025
The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) accepted a joint settlement memorandum between the petitioner Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga and defendants (her siblings and their children) in a property dispute. All defendants relinquished their rights to the suit property in favor of the petitioner as a gesture of family harmony, making her the absolute owner; defendants agreed never to claim rights over the property in future. The court decreed the petitioner's suit and issued a final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts