Smt. Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga vs Smt. Shaila Mahabaleshwar Gunaga — 122/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7,Rule.1,RWS.26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK210017122025

Case disposed

Filing Number

122/2025

Filing Date

07-11-2025

Registration No

122/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7,Rule.1,RWS.26

Petitioner(s)

Smt. Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga

Adv. A N TALAGERI

Respondent(s)

Smt. Shaila Mahabaleshwar Gunaga

Smt. Keertana Krishnanand Gunaga

Sanjeev Ganapati Gunaga

Suprasanna Virendra Gunaga

Subramanya Virendra Gunaga

Hearing History

Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Lokadalat

10-02-2026

A.D.R.

09-01-2026

SUMMONS

11-12-2025

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) accepted a joint settlement memorandum between the petitioner Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga and defendants (her siblings and their children) in a property dispute. All defendants relinquished their rights to the suit property in favor of the petitioner as a gesture of family harmony, making her the absolute owner; defendants agreed never to claim rights over the property in future. The court decreed the petitioner's suit and issued a final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalath (alternative dispute resolution forum) accepted a joint settlement memorandum between the petitioner Indira Gopalkrishna Gunaga and defendants (her siblings and their children) in a property dispute. All defendants relinquished their rights to the suit property in favor of the petitioner as a gesture of family harmony, making her the absolute owner; defendants agreed never to claim rights over the property in future. The court decreed the petitioner's suit and issued a final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case