Divyajyothi Finance and Investment Reg, Shiroor, R/by Managing Director, Purushotam Devappa Naik vs Venkatesh Laxman Naik — 540/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Status: Cross Exam. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK210015702024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
540/2024
Filing Date
07-10-2024
Registration No
540/2024
Registration Date
07-10-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Divyajyothi Finance and Investment Reg, Shiroor, R/by Managing Director, Purushotam Devappa Naik
Adv. VINOD VITTAL SHANBHAG
Respondent(s)
Venkatesh Laxman Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 24-01-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 30-12-2025 | Cross Exam |
| 17-12-2025 | Cross Exam |
| 28-11-2025 | Cross Exam |
Interim Orders
Case CC 540/2024 - Summary This is a criminal case before the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Ankola involving accused Venkatesh, charged under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque (Check No. 099723) for Rs. 3,00,000 that was rejected by the bank with "Bank Excluded" status. The court recorded the accused's statement under CrPC Section 313 on 13/01/2025, wherein the accused was questioned about the loan transaction, the bounced cheque, and the non-repayment of borrowed funds, and was given an opportunity to present his defense and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case CC 540/2024 - Summary This is a criminal case before the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Ankola involving accused Venkatesh, charged under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 for issuing a cheque (Check No. 099723) for Rs. 3,00,000 that was rejected by the bank with "Bank Excluded" status. The court recorded the accused's statement under CrPC Section 313 on 13/01/2025, wherein the accused was questioned about the loan transaction, the bounced cheque, and the non-repayment of borrowed funds, and was given an opportunity to present his defense and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts