THE JANATA CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED., Ankola R/by Manager Shri. Nityanand Timmanna Nayak. vs Manjunath Jatti Hanehalli — 461/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Cross Exam. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK210014432024
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
Filing Number
461/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
461/2024
Registration Date
30-09-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE JANATA CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED., Ankola R/by Manager Shri. Nityanand Timmanna Nayak.
Adv. VINOD VITTAL SHANBHAG
Respondent(s)
Manjunath Jatti Hanehalli
Hearing History
Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 20-02-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 13-01-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 10-12-2025 | Cross Exam |
| 27-11-2025 | Cross Exam |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: In Criminal Case No. 461/2024 before the Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ankola, the accused Manjunath was examined under Section 313 CrPC on 03-09-2025. The case involves cheque bouncing charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, where the accused issued a check for Rs. 1,72,823 that was returned with the remark "kindly contact drawer/drawee bank." The accused was given an opportunity to respond to the prosecution's evidence and questions, and the court proceeded with recording his statement in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: In Criminal Case No. 461/2024 before the Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court, Ankola, the accused Manjunath was examined under Section 313 CrPC on 03-09-2025. The case involves cheque bouncing charges under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138, where the accused issued a check for Rs. 1,72,823 that was returned with the remark "kindly contact drawer/drawee bank." The accused was given an opportunity to respond to the prosecution's evidence and questions, and the court proceeded with recording his statement in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts