Savitri Vinayak Naik vs Vinayak Chudiya Naik — 69/2017

Case under C.r.p.c Section 125(1). Status: N.B.W.. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAUK210013052017

N.B.W.

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

70/2017

Filing Date

13-09-2017

Registration No

69/2017

Registration Date

13-09-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

Acts & Sections

C.R.P.C Section 125(1)

Petitioner(s)

Savitri Vinayak Naik

Adv. SHRI.SUBHASH RAMAKANT NARVEKAR

Respondent(s)

Vinayak Chudiya Naik

Hearing History

Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

30-04-2026

N.B.W.

13-03-2026

N.B.W.

29-01-2026

N.B.W.

30-12-2025

N.B.W.

24-11-2025

For Report

Interim Orders

26-02-2019
Orders
21-03-2022
Deposition

This document is in Kannada and contains witness testimony from Savitri (petitioner) in case 69/2017. The court record documents her sworn statement regarding marital disputes with her husband Vinayak Chudiya Naik, including allegations of harassment, dowry demands, and being forced out of the matrimonial home on 01-07-2017. She requests maintenance of Rs. 15,000 monthly and presents documentary evidence (photographs, CD, and wedding invitation card). The document records that cross-examination time was granted to the respondent's counsel. However, this is only a witness testimony transcript, not a final court order or judgment resolving the case. SKIP - This document does not contain a final court order with a dispositive outcome (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.), only testimony proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is in Kannada and contains witness testimony from Savitri (petitioner) in case 69/2017. The court record documents her sworn statement regarding marital disputes with her husband Vinayak Chudiya Naik, including allegations of harassment, dowry demands, and being forced out of the matrimonial home on 01-07-2017. She requests maintenance of Rs. 15,000 monthly and presents documentary evidence (photographs, CD, and wedding invitation card). The document records that cross-examination time was granted to the respondent's counsel. However, this is only a witness testimony transcript, not a final court order or judgment resolving the case. SKIP - This document does not contain a final court order with a dispositive outcome (bail granted/denied, petition allowed/dismissed, etc.), only testimony proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case