KANARA DISTRICT PRIMARY TEACHERS CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., Ankola R/by Chief Executive Brijesh N vs Balakrishna V. Nayak — 385/2024
Case under C.r.p.c Section U/Sec.200. Status: Cross Exam. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK210012582024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
385/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
385/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANARA DISTRICT PRIMARY TEACHERS CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., Ankola R/by Chief Executive Brijesh N
Adv. Narayan Ramakrishna Nayak
Respondent(s)
Balakrishna V. Nayak
Hearing History
Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Cross Exam
N.B.W.
N.B.W.
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 01-04-2026 | N.B.W. |
| 13-03-2026 | N.B.W. |
| 27-02-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 09-01-2026 | Cross Exam |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 385/2024 Accused Balakrishna V. Nayak (59-year-old teacher) was examined under CrPC Section 313. The court recorded his statement regarding charges that he obtained a ₹10,00,000 loan from Kanara District Primary Teachers Co-op Credit Society on 06-07-2023 but issued a cheque for ₹10,27,699 on 27-11-2023 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds, despite prior notice. When confronted with witness testimony about the offense under NI Act Section 138, the accused denied the allegations. The case proceeded with the accused's statement recorded; no further order on conviction, bail, or adjournment is specified in this court proceeding dated 06-11-2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 385/2024 Accused Balakrishna V. Nayak (59-year-old teacher) was examined under CrPC Section 313. The court recorded his statement regarding charges that he obtained a ₹10,00,000 loan from Kanara District Primary Teachers Co-op Credit Society on 06-07-2023 but issued a cheque for ₹10,27,699 on 27-11-2023 that was dishonored due to insufficient funds, despite prior notice. When confronted with witness testimony about the offense under NI Act Section 138, the accused denied the allegations. The case proceeded with the accused's statement recorded; no further order on conviction, bail, or adjournment is specified in this court proceeding dated 06-11-2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts