AMRUTA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD, ANKOLA, R/by Recovery officer, Hemanth Narayan Gouda. vs Raghavendra Ganapati Nayak — 299/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Status: Cross Exam. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK210010242024

Cross Exam

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

Filing Number

299/2024

Filing Date

23-07-2024

Registration No

299/2024

Registration Date

23-07-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

AMRUTA CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD, ANKOLA, R/by Recovery officer, Hemanth Narayan Gouda.

Adv. GURU VENKAPPA NAIK

Respondent(s)

Raghavendra Ganapati Nayak

Hearing History

Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

06-03-2026

Cross Exam

14-01-2026

Cross Exam

18-12-2025

Cross Exam

25-11-2025

Cross Exam

12-11-2025

Cross Exam

Interim Orders

10-03-2025
Plea
10-03-2025
313 Statement

Case Summary Case No.: CC 299/2024 Court: Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Ankola Accused: Raghavendra Ganapati (41 years) Outcome: The accused's statement was recorded under Section 313 CrPC on 10-03-2025. The case involves charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for ₹83,252 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient" status. The accused was questioned regarding the allegations and given opportunity to present his defence; the matter appears to be in the trial stage with evidence examination ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: CC 299/2024 Court: Additional First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Ankola Accused: Raghavendra Ganapati (41 years) Outcome: The accused's statement was recorded under Section 313 CrPC on 10-03-2025. The case involves charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for ₹83,252 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient" status. The accused was questioned regarding the allegations and given opportunity to present his defence; the matter appears to be in the trial stage with evidence examination ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case