Gange Beeranna Gouda vs Sannatamma Ganapati Naik — 47/2017
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of C.p.c Section 26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210009792017
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
47/2017
Filing Date
13-07-2017
Registration No
47/2017
Registration Date
13-07-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gange Beeranna Gouda
Adv. SRI.M.P.BHAT
Neela Mangu Gouda
Nagamma Mahabaleshwar Gouda
Respondent(s)
Sannatamma Ganapati Naik
Venkatesh Sannatamma Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 47/2017 Court Order dated 29-10-2025 The court examined the plaintiff's witness regarding property transfer documents and payment of consideration money in a land dispute case. Key findings include: - Witness testimony: The witness admitted that three separate sale deeds were created on different dates (07-08-2015, 12-04-2016, and 07-03-2017) rather than a single transaction, and that defendants' family members orchestrated all documentation without the witness's involvement in critical procedural steps. - Fraudulent documents: The court found that forged/bogus sale deeds were deliberately created to deceive the plaintiffs, with the defendants' plan to transfer property to the plaintiff's name while maintaining actual control through fraudulent agreements. - Witness credibility: The witness could not adequately explain inconsistencies regarding payment details, dates of discussion with plaintiffs, and prior knowledge of the three defendants' educational background. Case adjourned for further proceedings. No final judgment delivered in this order—this appears to be an interim hearing documenting witness examination during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 47/2017 Court Order dated 29-10-2025 The court examined the plaintiff's witness regarding property transfer documents and payment of consideration money in a land dispute case. Key findings include: - Witness testimony: The witness admitted that three separate sale deeds were created on different dates (07-08-2015, 12-04-2016, and 07-03-2017) rather than a single transaction, and that defendants' family members orchestrated all documentation without the witness's involvement in critical procedural steps. - Fraudulent documents: The court found that forged/bogus sale deeds were deliberately created to deceive the plaintiffs, with the defendants' plan to transfer property to the plaintiff's name while maintaining actual control through fraudulent agreements. - Witness credibility: The witness could not adequately explain inconsistencies regarding payment details, dates of discussion with plaintiffs, and prior knowledge of the three defendants' educational background. Case adjourned for further proceedings. No final judgment delivered in this order—this appears to be an interim hearing documenting witness examination during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts