Gange Beeranna Gouda vs Sannatamma Ganapati Naik — 46/2017
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of C.p.c Section 26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210009782017
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
46/2017
Filing Date
13-07-2017
Registration No
46/2017
Registration Date
13-07-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gange Beeranna Gouda
Adv. SRI.M.P.BHAT
Neela Mangu Gouda
Nagamma Mahabaleshwar Gouda
Respondent(s)
Sannatamma Ganapati Naik
Venkatesh Sannatamma Naik
Tukaram Hanuma Gouda Yane Gaonkar
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 26-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 46/2017 Court Order dated 29-10-2025 The witness was recalled and examined under oath. The court heard arguments from counsel for the 2nd respondent (Sri V.V.S.) and the petitioner's counsel (Sri M.P.B.). Key Findings: The court examined witness testimony regarding three separate sale deeds dated 07-08-2015, 12-04-2016, and 07-03-2017. The witness testimony established that: - The respondents created fraudulent/bogus sale deed documents with forged signatures - Money was transferred on 16-01-2015 under false pretenses - The petitioners conspired with family members to deceive the respondents regarding property transfers - Fabricated documents were created to misrepresent land ownership - No genuine agreement existed; the respondents were defrauded through fraudulent conveyancing Order: No further examination required. The court found the respondents' contentions that the sale deeds were bogus and created through fraud to be supported by witness testimony. The case substantiates fraudulent misrepresentation regarding immovable property transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 46/2017 Court Order dated 29-10-2025 The witness was recalled and examined under oath. The court heard arguments from counsel for the 2nd respondent (Sri V.V.S.) and the petitioner's counsel (Sri M.P.B.). Key Findings: The court examined witness testimony regarding three separate sale deeds dated 07-08-2015, 12-04-2016, and 07-03-2017. The witness testimony established that: - The respondents created fraudulent/bogus sale deed documents with forged signatures - Money was transferred on 16-01-2015 under false pretenses - The petitioners conspired with family members to deceive the respondents regarding property transfers - Fabricated documents were created to misrepresent land ownership - No genuine agreement existed; the respondents were defrauded through fraudulent conveyancing Order: No further examination required. The court found the respondents' contentions that the sale deeds were bogus and created through fraud to be supported by witness testimony. The case substantiates fraudulent misrepresentation regarding immovable property transactions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts