Rajesh J. Palankar vs Praveen S. Raikar — 679/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Cross Exam. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK210008172025
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
198/2025
Filing Date
06-06-2025
Registration No
679/2025
Registration Date
06-06-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajesh J. Palankar
Adv. Prakash Puthu Gowda
Respondent(s)
Praveen S. Raikar
Hearing History
Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
Cross Exam
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 23-04-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 13-03-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 22-01-2026 | Cross Exam |
| 17-12-2025 | Cross Exam |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 679/2025 Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Ankola Parties: Petitioner Rajesh J. Palankar vs. Respondent Praveen S. Raikar Outcome: Case recorded accused's statement under Section 313 IPC. Petitioner alleged respondent received Rs. 14,40,000 in installments for supply of chinaware but failed to deliver goods by December 2024. Despite prior notice, respondent issued two cheques dated 25-03-2025 (Check Nos. 440439 and 440440 for Rs. 7,20,000 each) which bounced with "Funds Insufficient" endorsement. Witness testimony established offence under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. Case adjourned pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 679/2025 Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Ankola Parties: Petitioner Rajesh J. Palankar vs. Respondent Praveen S. Raikar Outcome: Case recorded accused's statement under Section 313 IPC. Petitioner alleged respondent received Rs. 14,40,000 in installments for supply of chinaware but failed to deliver goods by December 2024. Despite prior notice, respondent issued two cheques dated 25-03-2025 (Check Nos. 440439 and 440440 for Rs. 7,20,000 each) which bounced with "Funds Insufficient" endorsement. Witness testimony established offence under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138. Case adjourned pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts