Smt. Susheela Ramachandra Naik vs Shri. Vithal Nagappa Naik — 234/2024

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK210008032024

Filing Number

235/2024

Filing Date

16-May-2024

Registration No

234/2024

Registration Date

18-Jun-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

522-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Susheela Ramachandra Naik

    Adv. VINAYAK SHANKAR NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Vithal Nagappa Naik

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    The court found the defendant guilty of fraudulently obtaining three checks (for ₹75,000, ₹15,000, and ₹25,000) from a microfinance institution under false pretenses by misrepresenting a loan taken in his wife's name. The court rejected the defendant's defense claims and determined he misused the funds for purposes unrelated to the stated loan purpose, establishing his criminal liability for fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  10. 22-Dec-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  13. 03-Nov-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  14. 27-Oct-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  15. 26-Sep-2025

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  16. 11-Sep-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  18. 21-Aug-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  19. 28-Jul-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  21. 21-Jun-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  22. 05-May-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  23. 21-Apr-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  24. 28-Mar-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  25. 07-Mar-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  26. 15-Feb-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  27. 10-Feb-2025

    Payment

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  28. 22-Jan-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  29. 06-Jan-2025

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  30. 13-Dec-2024

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  31. 20-Nov-2024

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  32. 22-Oct-2024

    Cross Exam

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  33. 09-Oct-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  34. 23-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  35. 10-Sep-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  36. 26-Jul-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Ankola

  37. 18-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 16-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the defendant guilty of fraudulently obtaining three checks (for ₹75,000, ₹15,000, and ₹25,000) from a microfinance institution under false pretenses by misrepresenting a loan taken in his wife's name. The court rejected the defendant's defense claims and determined he misused the funds for purposes unrelated to the stated loan purpose, establishing his criminal liability for fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case