Ramachandra Dinna Naik vs Govind Dinna Naik — 34/2020
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of C.p.c. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210006262020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
34/2020
Filing Date
04-09-2020
Registration No
34/2020
Registration Date
04-09-2020
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramachandra Dinna Naik
Adv. SHRI.SUBHASH RAMAKANT NARVEKAR
Respondent(s)
Govind Dinna Naik
Susheela Dinna Naik @ Susheela Ganapati Naik
Gulabi Dinna Naik @ Gulabi Vaman Naik
Rummi Dinna Naik @ Rama Shashikant Butke
Seeta Dinna Naik @ Lata Shantaram Naik
Beerappa Dinna Naik
Sudha Ishwarappa Naik
Soma @ Raki Bobri Naik
Kamala Bobri Naik @ Kamala Vasant Naik
Vimala Bobri Naik @ Vimala Suresh Naik
Janaki Bobri Naik @ Janaki Mahabaleshwar Naik
Krishna Bobri Naik
Bharati Nagesh Naik
Kamala Rama Naik
Bharatesh Rama Naik
Jyothi Rama Naik
Milan Rama Naik
Bhavani Bobri Naik @ Geeta Subray Naik
Prameela Ganapati Naik @ Prameela Devidas Naik
Darshan Rama Naik
Neela Ganapati Naik @ Neela Devaray Naik
Manjunath Ganapati Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 34/2020 | Date: 13-03-2026 Outcome: The case has been adjourned for further hearing. The court recorded witness testimony regarding a property dispute concerning Survey No. 298. The witness was recalled and examined regarding the plaintiff's claims about property ownership, boundary demarcation, and public right-of-way issues. The court noted contradictions in the plaintiff's evidence regarding the existence of a public road and ordered the case to proceed with further examination of witnesses and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 34/2020 | Date: 13-03-2026 Outcome: The case has been adjourned for further hearing. The court recorded witness testimony regarding a property dispute concerning Survey No. 298. The witness was recalled and examined regarding the plaintiff's claims about property ownership, boundary demarcation, and public right-of-way issues. The court noted contradictions in the plaintiff's evidence regarding the existence of a public road and ordered the case to proceed with further examination of witnesses and evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts