Mahadev Narayan Navage (Since Deceased R/by his legal heirs)(Legal Heir) vs Rohidas Narayan Navage — 90/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/Or..XXI,Rule11. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAUK210003822024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
90/2024
Filing Date
06-03-2024
Registration No
90/2024
Registration Date
20-04-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadev Narayan Navage (Since Deceased R/by his legal heirs)(Legal Heir)
Adv. S.P.Bhoote1.
Parvati Mahadev Navage 1.
Sangita yane Santoshi wife of Santosh Dhamsadekar 1.
Seema yane Nirmal Nagesh Kalaskar 1.
Reshma yane Reshma Ramesh Tari 1.
Narayan Mahadev Navage 1.
Shakuntala yane Arti Manjunath Halankar
Respondent(s)
Rohidas Narayan Navage
Anandi Narayan Navage,
Prema Prakash Juvekar
Vijaya Durva Dhuri
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 09-01-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 03-12-2025 | HEARING |
| 10-10-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The execution petition filed by decree holders to execute a partition decree (FDP NO. 4/2020) based on a settlement before the National Lok Adalath was allowed. The court overruled objections filed by Judgment Debtor No.1, finding that the objector was impermissibly trying to indirectly challenge the final decree by raising the issue of unmapped house property in execution proceedings. The court directed the Tahsildar, Ankola to effect necessary mutation entries and issue possession warrants according to FDP NO. 4/2020, as only landed property was included in the final decree and settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The execution petition filed by decree holders to execute a partition decree (FDP NO. 4/2020) based on a settlement before the National Lok Adalath was allowed. The court overruled objections filed by Judgment Debtor No.1, finding that the objector was impermissibly trying to indirectly challenge the final decree by raising the issue of unmapped house property in execution proceedings. The court directed the Tahsildar, Ankola to effect necessary mutation entries and issue possession warrants according to FDP NO. 4/2020, as only landed property was included in the final decree and settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts