Shankar Huliyappa Gouda vs Fransis Fascal Fernandez — 15/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section u/Or.VII, Rule1,2, Sec.26,151. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210002382024
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
05-Feb-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
06-Feb-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
1334-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shankar Huliyappa Gouda
Adv. S.O.NAIK
-
2.Jayu Huliyappa Gouda,
-
3.Vithoba Huliyappa Gouda
-
4.Savitri Huliyappa Gouda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Fransis Fascal Fernandez
-
2.Raju Rama Naik
-
3.Gopalkrishna Channappa Naik
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
05-Nov-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
14-Oct-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
24-Sep-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
03-Sep-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
20-Aug-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
30-Jul-2025
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
04-Jun-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
15-Apr-2025
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
12-Mar-2025
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
19-Feb-2025
Summons
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
22-Jan-2025
Hear on I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
04-Jan-2025
Hear on I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
12-Dec-2024
Hear on I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
26-Nov-2024
Hear on I.A.
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
13-Nov-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
29-Oct-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
15-Oct-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
25-Sep-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
19-Sep-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
03-Sep-2024
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
13-Aug-2024
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
31-Jul-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
25-Jul-2024
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS 15/2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application (I.A.NO.II) seeking permission to cross-examine the defendants' affidavit deponents at the interlocutory stage of a temporary injunction hearing. Key Reasoning: The court held that Order XIX Rule 2 of the CPC, which permits cross-examination of deponents, does not apply to interlocutory applications like temporary injunction proceedings. At the interlocutory stage, courts need only examine the prima facie case based on pleadings and documents—not conduct a full trial. Permitting cross-examination would constitute a "mini trial" on the merits, which is impermissible at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jul-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
12-Jul-2024
Order
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
08-Jul-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
01-Jul-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
24-Jun-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
12-Jun-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
01-Jun-2024
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
19-Apr-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
08-Apr-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
01-Apr-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
20-Mar-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
14-Mar-2024
Hearing
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
29-Feb-2024
Objection
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
09-Feb-2024
Notice
Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Ankola
-
06-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2024
Case Summary: OS 15/2024 Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' application (I.A.NO.II) seeking permission to cross-examine the defendants' affidavit deponents at the interlocutory stage of a temporary injunction hearing. Key Reasoning: The court held that Order XIX Rule 2 of the CPC, which permits cross-examination of deponents, does not apply to interlocutory applications like temporary injunction proceedings. At the interlocutory stage, courts need only examine the prima facie case based on pleadings and documents—not conduct a full trial. Permitting cross-examination would constitute a "mini trial" on the merits, which is impermissible at this preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts