Hosabu Shikya Gouda vs D-1. Sadashiva Durgu Gouda — 2/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section26,Order7,Rule1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK210000242022
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
2/2022
Filing Date
05-01-2022
Registration No
2/2022
Registration Date
05-01-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Judge
522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hosabu Shikya Gouda
Adv. Manjunath Parameshwar Bhat
Respondent(s)
D-1. Sadashiva Durgu Gouda
D-2. Kusalu Durgu Gouda
Hearing History
Judge: 522-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 02/2022 On 15-10-2024, witness examination continued with cross-examination by the respondents' counsel. The witness testified regarding Neelamma Durgu Gouda (respondent's mother) and documents PI-13 through PI-16. The witness confirmed Neelamma Durgu Gouda's involvement as a witness/party in related documents and that Sunita Kusalu Gouda (respondent's wife) is named in certain documents. The witness stated the petitioner has no authority to file the suit, lacks any rights over the disputed property, and alleged the suit was filed falsely with the respondents misrepresented as witnesses. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Deposition
Case Summary: O.S. 02/2022 On 15-10-2024, witness examination continued with cross-examination by the respondents' counsel. The witness testified regarding Neelamma Durgu Gouda (respondent's mother) and documents PI-13 through PI-16. The witness confirmed Neelamma Durgu Gouda's involvement as a witness/party in related documents and that Sunita Kusalu Gouda (respondent's wife) is named in certain documents. The witness stated the petitioner has no authority to file the suit, lacks any rights over the disputed property, and alleged the suit was filed falsely with the respondents misrepresented as witnesses. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts