Mahadev Nagappa Naik vs Dinesh Rameshwar Naik — 143/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,2,26. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK030012022025
Filing Number
144/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
143/2025
Registration Date
14-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC II, KARWAR
Judge
521-CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
Last updated 26-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahadev Nagappa Naik
Adv. Jambavalikar Gangadhar Narayan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dinesh Rameshwar Naik
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Judgement
-
28-Apr-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
28-Feb-2026
Judgement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
18-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
In Case 143/2025 between Mahadev Nagappa Naik and Dinesh Rameshwar Naik, the court held the hearing on 18-02-2026. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted as evidence (marked NI-P1). The defendant's challenge to the petition was rejected as being one-sided. The case appears to have proceeded with examination of witnesses and evidence on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Feb-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC II Court, Karwar
-
14-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 143/2025
In Case 143/2025 between Mahadev Nagappa Naik and Dinesh Rameshwar Naik, the court held the hearing on 18-02-2026. The petitioner's affidavit was admitted as evidence (marked NI-P1). The defendant's challenge to the petition was rejected as being one-sided. The case appears to have proceeded with examination of witnesses and evidence on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts